ON DEVICE
Clinical review
← Back

Everything this app claims, in one place.

Two jobs: check each instrument name against the item in front of you, and read every claim below. Nothing here is approved — this is a draft written by the build.

Not a sign-off
This page records nothing. Sign off in PROGRESS.md, with your name against the wording you approved, so there is a record of who agreed to what.
1 · Instrument names the deployed model can produce
Loading the deployed class list…
2 · Every claim the app makes

Generated from lib/copy.ts, so it is what the app actually shows. Rewrite there and it changes everywhere at once.

Browser tab, install prompt
App description
“Photograph a surgical tray before and after a procedure and audit what came back. A second pair of eyes, not a replacement for the manual count.”
Case start
Advisory kicker
“Second pair of eyes”
Case start
Advisory body
“Does not replace the manual count or the WHO checklist. Technology demonstration — not validated in theatre.”
Reportinstruction
Verdict — missing
“Do not close. Locate the items listed below, then re-photograph the tray.”
Report
Verdict — unexpected
“Something is on the tray that was not there at the start. Confirm where it came from.”
Reportinstruction
Verdict — names not confirmed
“Nothing is missing and nothing is unexpected, but an item's name has not been confirmed. Check the names against the tray before you rely on this.”
Reportinstruction
Verdict — all accounted for
“Every manifest item matched at the expected count. Confirm against the manual count.”
Reportinstruction
Footer
“Advisory only. Reconcile against the manual count before closing.”
Exported case file
Disclaimer
“Advisory record from a technology demonstration. Not a clinical document. The manual count and the WHO checklist remain the record of the count.”
Landing, hero
Caveat
“A second pair of eyes. The manual count and the WHO checklist stay exactly as they are.”
Landing, what this is not
Not validated in theatre
“The model is trained on desk captures of real instruments and common medical items, not on data from an operating theatre. Different lighting, drapes, blood, fluid, sterile gloves in frame — transfer is unvalidated. It is the first thing Phase 2 fixes.”
Landing, what this is not
Not tested against a workflow
“This is a technology demonstration of the counting and reconciliation mechanism. Nothing here has been tested against a clinical workflow.”
Landing, what this is not
Not a counting system
“Retained surgical items are a never-event with regulatory weight. The manual count and the WHO checklist stay exactly as they are. The app's job is to catch the case where the manual count was already wrong.”
3 · What the build will not claim for you
  • Whether any of these instrument names is correct. Nobody on the build side has seen the physical items.
  • That the counting is safe to rely on. It is measured on synthetic trays and web catalogue photographs, never on a real tray in a theatre.
  • Any patient-safety benefit. No such claim appears anywhere above, and none should be added without evidence that does not yet exist.